The Crisis of Artificial Intelligence Governance in the United States: Regulatory Fragmentation and the Centralization of Power

Main Article Content

Kotchakorn Jueayjaew

Abstract

This study examines the multidimensional factors driving the United States’ shift in artificial intelligence (AI) governance during the critical period of 2023–2025. It focuses on the transition from a safety-oriented regulatory framework to one prioritizing accelerated innovation and proactive technological competition. The research adopts a qualitative methodology, drawing on policy document analysis.


            The findings identify three key driving dimensions. First, the structural dimension reflects a response to the legislative vacuum in Congress and the fragmentation of state-level regulations, both of which weaken national coherence. Second, the political economy dimension highlights a transition toward a techno-partner state model, aimed at stabilizing policy frameworks for infrastructure investment while reducing regulatory compliance costs for large technology firms and capital groups. Third, the geopolitical dimension elevates AI to a national security concern, enabling the executive branch to justify the adoption of a techno-realist approach to sustain competitive advantage, particularly in relation to China.


            In conclusion, the study argues that the move toward a centralized “One-Rule Paradigm” represents a strategic adaptation by the federal government to reassert its authority as the primary rule-setter. This shift occurs in response to growing institutional fragmentation and intensifying global technological competition, positioning centralized governance as a mechanism to maintain both domestic coherence and international competitiveness.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jueayjaew, K. (2026). The Crisis of Artificial Intelligence Governance in the United States: : Regulatory Fragmentation and the Centralization of Power. Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, Kasetsart University (JPSPAKU), 4(1), 87–127. retrieved from https://so14.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PSPAJKU/article/view/2964
Section
Research Articles

References

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421-456.

Ballot Jones, L., Thornton, J., & De Silva, D. (2025). Limitations of risk-based artificial intelligence regulation: A structuration theory approach. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(14). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00233-9

Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Buczynski, W., Steffek, F., Cuzzolin, F., Jamnik, M., & Sahakian, B. (2023). Hard law and soft law regulations of artificial intelligence in investment management. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 24, 262-293.

Buiten, M. C. (2019). Towards intelligent regulation of artificial intelligence. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 10(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2019.8

Calo, R., & Citron, D. K. (2021). The automated administrative state: A crisis of legitimacy. Emory Law Journal, 70(4), 797-845.

Casey, B., & Lemley, M. A. (2019). You might be a robot. Cornell Law Review, 105(2), 287-350.

Creemers, R. (2018). China's social credit system: An evolving practice of control. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175792

Ding, J. (2018). Deciphering China's AI dream: The context, components, capabilities, and consequences of China's strategy to lead the world in AI. Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chiriatti, M., Moor, J., Stix, V., & T católica (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 29(4), 689–707.

Grumbach, J. M. (2023). Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding. American Political Science Review, 117(3), 967–984. doi:10.1017/S0003055422000934

Heath, M., Kasif, S., & Salzberg, S. (1997). Learning oblique decision trees. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1002-1007).

Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Law as computation in the era of artificial legal intelligence: Speaking law to the power of statistics. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(Supplement 1), 12-35.

Issue One. (2025, January 22). Big tech cozies up to new administration after spending record sums on lobbying last year. https://issueone.org/articles/big-tech-spent-record-sums-on-lobbying-last-year/

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.

Marchant, G. E. (2011). The growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1356-7

Marchant, G. E., & Allenby, B. R. (2009). Soft law: A new approach for regulating emerging technologies. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 37(4), 71-78.

Marshall, C. (2025, January 22). Here's what's in 'Stargate,' the $500-billion Trump-endorsed plan to power U.S. AI. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-whats-in-stargate-the-usd500-billion-trump-endorsed-plan-to-power-u-s/

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Dartmouth College.

Meltzer, J. P., Kerry, C. F., & Sheehan, M. (2024). Can Democracies Cooperate with China on AI: Rebalancing AI Reserarch Networks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4685319

Moses, L. B. (2013). How to think about law, regulation and technology: Problems with 'technology' as a regulatory target. Law, Innovation and Technology, 5(1), 1-20.

Rahman, K. S. (2018). The new utilities: Private power, social infrastructure, and the revival of the public utility concept. Cardozo Law Review, 39(5), 1621-1690.

Rashid, A. B., & Kausik, M. A. K. (2024). AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications. Hybrid Advances, 7, 100277.

Rich, E. (1983). Artificial intelligence. McGraw-Hill.

Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Hine, E., et al. (2021). Achieving a 'good AI society': Comparing the aims and progress of the EU and the US. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 68.

Ruschemeier, H. (2023). The lack of a common understanding of AI governance. Digital Society, 2, 15.

Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Skopeliti, C. (2025, January 28). Donald Trump calls China's DeepSeek AI chatbot a 'wake-up call.' The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/28/first-thing-donald-trump-calls-chinas-deepseek-ai-chatbot-a-wake-up-call

Smuha, N. A. (2021). Beyond the individual: Governing AI's societal harm. Internet Policy Review, 10(3), 1-32.

Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3-21.

Thierer, Adam. 2018. “The Pacing Problem and the Future of Technology Regulation.” Mercatus Center. Retrieved (https://www.mercatus.org/economic-insights/expert-commentary/pacing-problem-and-future-technology-regulation).

Wilkenfeld, D. A. (2019). Understanding representation in systems that act. Synthese, 196, 2585-2608.