Participatory Student Affairs Administration Approach of Protpittayapayat School, The Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to 1) study the current state of participation in student affairs administration at Protpittayapayat School under The Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2, and 2) develop a participatory student affairs administration approach for Protpittayapayat School under The Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2. The research population consisted of school administrators, school board members, and teachers, totaling 162 people. Key informants included 9 experts, school administrators, educational supervisors, and teachers responsible for student affairs. Research instruments included a questionnaire on the current state of participation in student affairs administration and an evaluation form for the participatory student affairs administration approach. Statistical analysis included means, standard deviations, and content analysis.
The research findings revealed that 1) the current state of participation in student affairs administration was overall at a high level (x̄ = 3.90, S.D. = 0.63). When considered by aspects, implementation had the highest mean score (x̄ = 4.20, S.D. = 0.58) while monitoring and evaluation had the lowest mean score (x̄ = 3.55, S.D. = 0.71). 2) The developed participatory student affairs administration approach comprised 5 aspects: participation in planning, implementation, decision-making, monitoring and evaluation, and resource support. Expert evaluation showed that the approach had overall appropriateness at the highest level (x̄ = 4.65, S.D. = 0.49) and overall feasibility at a high level (x̄ = 4.41, S.D. = 0.55). This approach emphasizes creating integrated working committees, organizing participatory planning workshops, using student councils as decision-making mechanisms, developing participatory monitoring and evaluation systems, and establishing collaborative networks for resource mobilization.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright - Roi Et Buddhist College Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University 252 M.4 , Niwet, Thawutburi, Roi-Et, Thailand, 45170 Tel 082 229 2269 http://www.roiet.mcu.ac.th. Email : roietjournal@gmail.com
References
Anderson, M., & Lee, S. (2022). Participatory approaches in secondary education: A Canadian perspective. Journal of Educational Management, 45(3), 234-251.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1997). Research in education (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Boonrodrám, S. (2025). Development of participatory student support system to enhance life skills competency of students at Ban Khlong Hin School. Journal of Education Nakhon Ratchasima College, 4(1), 100–112.
Davis, K., & Newstrom, J. W. (1985). Human behavior at work: Organizational behavior (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
García, L., & Martinez, R. (2023). Student participation in decision-making: Impact on engagement and achievement in Spanish secondary schools. International Journal of School Management, 38(2), 178-195.
Koontz, H., & O'Donnell, C. (1990). Principles of management: An analysis of managerial functions (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Miller, J., & Campbell, D. (2021). Supporting factors for participation in educational institutions: Communication, capacity building, and motivation. School Administration Review, 36(1), 89-106.
Nakamura, T., & Wilson, A. (2021). Collaborative planning in Japanese schools: Effects on project success. Asian Educational Research, 29(3), 156-172.
Noikhlai, P. (2016). A study of community participation approaches in school administration under Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Municipality. Valaya Alongkorn Research and Development Journal Under Royal Patronage in Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 35-43.
Patel, S., & Brown, M. (2022). Community-based resource mobilization in Indian schools: Network effectiveness study. Global Education Review, 41(2), 203-219.
Pateman, C. (2022). Participation and democratic theory: Contemporary applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Rongsàk, P., & Thiamklang, O. (2025). Teacher and staff participation in school administration at Prathái School, Prathái District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province. Journal of Education Nakhon Ratchasima College, 4(1), 47–56.
Rùngarun, S., & Trairat, P. (2024). Guidelines for student affairs administration to promote eight desirable characteristics based on sustainable development concept of Sahawittayakhet Tha Chin School Group under Samut Sakhon Primary Educational Service Area Office. Bhawana Review, 4(02), AR 23–44.
Saensuk, R., Panyasai, W., & Rojananiti, S. (2024). Guidelines for student affairs administration in schools under Chachoengsao Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. Panyaphat Social Science Journal, 6(4), 581–594.
Stoner, J. A. F., & Freeman, R. E. (1992). Management (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Suchatlampong, N. (2020). Guidelines for developing student affairs administration at Rajvinit Secondary School based on global citizenship concept. Master's Thesis in Educational Administration, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University.
Thompson, R., & Rodriguez, M. (2020). Challenges in creating participatory evaluation in Australian educational institutions. Educational Assessment International, 35(4), 312-329.
Thongsri, O., et al. (2014). Participatory student affairs administration model of secondary schools under Secondary Educational Service Area Office. Chantrakasem Journal, 20(38), 143–151.
Wongwatkesom, W., & Thiantet, B. (2024). Parental participation in school administration at Ban Khok Bai Bua School under Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. Journal of Education Nakhon Ratchasima College, 3(1), 38-48.
