The Relationship Between the Nomination Committee Remuneration Committee Family Ownership Structure and Firm Performance

Authors

  • Suphattra Ladadas Burapha Business School, Burapha University

Keywords:

Firm Performance, Nomination Committee, Remuneration Committee

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between the nomination committee, remuneration committee, family ownership structure, and firm performance of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) during 2013 to 2017.  The sample size consisted of 825 companies which excluded the group of undergoing operation rehabilitation, financial sectors and real estate funds, and insurance and life insurance business. The data used in this study were secondary source from an online database provided by SET Market Analysis and Reporting Tool (SET SMART). Data analysis used the econometrics analysis program for testing the hypothesis. Results were that all of these committees were not significant statistical correlated with the firm Performance when measured by return on assets and Tobin’s Q. There is a high possibility that the committee might lack expertise or reduced role in providing important information to the administration. Therefore, it does not affect firm performance.

References

ตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย. (2555). หลักการกำกับดูแลกิจการที่สำหรับบริษัทจดทะเบียนปี 2555. ศูนย์พัฒนาการ

กำกับดูแลกิจการบริษัทจดทะเบียน.

พรอนงค์ บุษราตระกูล และสุนทรี เหล่าพัดจัน. (2560). การศึกษาความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างค่าตอบแทนกรรมการ ระดับของการ

กำกับดูแลกิจการที่ดีและผลการดำเนินงานของบริษัทจดทะเบียนของประเทศไทย.

วิภาดา ภาโนมัย. (2559). โครงสร้างคณะกรรมการบริหารกับผลการดาเนินงานของบริษัทจดทะเบียนกลุ่มธุรกิจอาหารและ

เครื่องดื่ม. WMS Journal of Management, 5(2), 44-55.

Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from

the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.

Barontini, R., & Caprio, L. (2006). The Effect of Family Control on Firm Value and Performance: Evidence

from Continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5), 689-723.

Bhabra, G. S. (2007). Managerial ownership and firm-value in New Zealand. Journal of Multinational

Financial Management, 17, 142–154.

Black, BS, Jang, H, & Kim, U. (2002). Does corporate governance matter?: Evidence from the Korean

market.

Cybinski, Patti, & Windsor, Carolyn. (2013). Remuneration Committee Independence and CEO

Remuneration for Firm Financial Performance (Vol. 26).

Fama, Eugene F, & Jensen, Michael C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and

Economics, 26.

Fauzi, Fitriya, & Locke, Stuart. (2012). Board structure, ownership structure and firm performance: A study

of New Zealand listed-firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8(2), 43-

Hermalin, B. E, & Weisbach, Michael. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined

institution: a survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 5, 7-26.

Jensen, Michael C., & Meckling, William H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency

costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kallamu, Basiru Salisu. (2016). Nomination Committee Attributes and Firm Performance. Evidence from

Finance Companies in Malaysia. 3(1), 16.

Klein, April. (1998). Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure. The Journal of Law & Economics,

(1), 275-304.

Mintah, Peter Agyemang. (2015). The nomination committee and firm performance. An empirical

investigation of UK financial institutions during the pre/post financial crisis (Vol. 11).

Mintah, Peter Agyemang. (2016). Remuneration Committee governance and firm performance in UK

financial firms. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(1), 176-190.

Mintah, Peter Agyemang, & Schadewitz, H. (2015). Audit Committee and its impact on the financial

performance of a firm. An empirical investigation of UK financial institutions during the pre/post

financial crisis. Working Paper.

Mohammad, Ahmad Abu Zraiq, & Fadzil, Faudziah Hanim Bt. (2018). The Impact of Ownership Structure

on Firm Performance: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk

Management, 3(1), 1-4.

Shyu, J. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: evidence from Taiwanese firms. International

Journal of Managerial Finance, 7(4), 397-411.

Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Ko, C. E. (2002). Corporate Governance and Rating System. Taipei: Sunbright

Publishing Co. (in Chainese).

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Ladadas, S. (2019). The Relationship Between the Nomination Committee Remuneration Committee Family Ownership Structure and Firm Performance. Journal of Liberal Arts and Management Science Kasetsart University, 6(1), 30–45. Retrieved from https://so14.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jlams/article/view/41

Issue

Section

Research Article