Educational Safety Management Laws Explore Dimensions that influence Course Descriptions Focused on Safety School With AI Prompt

Main Article Content

sumat bunsud

Abstract

The objective of this research on the course description of Educational Safety Management is to explore the interrelated dimensions that influence the development of course descriptions focused on safety within educational institutions. This study adopts a systematic research process through the analysis of relevant legal frameworks and the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The sample for this study comprises laws related to occupational health and safety, labor laws and the Workmen’s Compensation Fund, educational legislation, and other relevant legal statutes. Based on the analysis of relevant Thai legal documents, the findings of this study indicate that the development of a course description for Educational Safety Management should integrate multi-dimensional legal perspectives to ensure its comprehensiveness and practical applicability. The study identifies four primary legal dimensions influencing course design: Occupational Health and Safety Laws – These emphasize preventive measures, risk assessment, and the promotion of a safe working environment for all stakeholders in educational settings. Labor Laws and the Workmen’s Compensation Fund – These provide legal protections and compensation mechanisms for personnel affected by workplace accidents or occupational diseases, which are critical in framing institutional safety policies. Educational Legislation – This defines the roles, responsibilities, and safety rights of students, teachers, and school administrators, reinforcing the necessity of embedding safety education within formal curricula. Other Relevant Legal Statutes – These include civil and administrative laws that support the enforcement of safety standards and institutional accountability. The integration of these legal dimensions, supported by AI-based analysis, contributes to a more structured, legally grounded, and responsive course description that aligns with both national standards and institutional safety goals.

Article Details

How to Cite
bunsud, sumat. (2025). Educational Safety Management Laws Explore Dimensions that influence Course Descriptions Focused on Safety School With AI Prompt. Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, Kasetsart University (JPSPAKU), 3(2). retrieved from https://so14.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PSPAJKU/article/view/1892
Section
Research Articles

References

Chantarasombat, C. (2017). Educational policy development for enhancing school safety in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration, 13(1), 45–59.

Chinda, T., & Mohamed, S. (2008). Structural equation model of construction safety culture. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980810852655

Ministry of Labour. (2022). Labour protection and compensation for educational personnel. Bangkok: Department of Labour Protection and Welfare.

Praphat, T. (2019). Legal liability and governance in educational administration. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Safe Work Australia. (2021). Work health and safety in the education and training sector. https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au

Yin, Z., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education and law: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 25–37.