Bridging Political and Academic Discourse: A Pedagogical Framework for Teaching Textual Grammatical Metaphors

Authors

  • Nguyễn Hồng Oanh Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanity, Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh University of Banking, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/bej.2025.9

Keywords:

Systemic Functional Linguistics, grammatical metaphors, textual grammatical metaphors, political discourse, inaugural address

Abstract

This study examines textual grammatical metaphors in Donald Trump's 2017 inaugural address through Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to develop a pedagogical framework for teaching advanced academic writing. Using qualitative discourse analysis based on Thompson's (2004) framework, we identify and categorise 67 instances of textual grammatical metaphors, revealing how they construct binary worldviews, establish collective identity, and create temporal framing. We then demonstrate how these patterns can be transformed into explicit teaching materials for academic writing instruction. The study presents a four-stage pedagogical approach that uses accessible political texts to scaffold students' understanding of complex textual organisation. Pilot implementation suggestions show how instructors can guide students from recognising these patterns in political discourse to producing appropriate academic texts. The research bridges discourse analysis and writing pedagogy, providing concrete strategies for enhancing students' textual coherence and rhetorical effectiveness.

References

Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.005

Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Presidents creating the presidency: Deeds done in words. University of Chicago Press.

Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Continuum.

Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour, new language? Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. E. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. Routledge.

Gebhard, M., & Accurso, K. (2020). Systemic functional linguistics. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1038-1045). Wiley-Blackwell.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Falmer.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction.

Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005

Kazemian, B., & Hashemi, S. (2014). Critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama's 2012 speeches: Views from systemic functional linguistics and rhetoric. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1178-1187. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.6.1178-1187

Liardét, C. L. (2016). Nominalisation and grammatical metaphor: Elaborating the theory. English for Specific Purposes, 44, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.04.004

Liardét, C. L. (2018). 'As we all know': Examining Chinese EFL learners' use of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.005

Liu, Y., & Gao, X. (2010). A corpus-based study of logical connectors in Chinese EFL learners' argumentative writing. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4), 126-146.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. John Benjamins.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & Maton, K. (2017). Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory on education: Rethinking field and knowledge structure. Onomázein, (Special Issue SFL), 12-45. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.sfl.02

Miller, R. T., Mitchell, T. D., & Pessoa, S. (2016). Impact of source texts and prompts on students' genre uptake. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.001

Montgomery, M. (2017). Post-truth politics? Authenticity, populism and the electoral discourses of Donald Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 619-639. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17023.mon

Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002

Ravelli, L. (2003). Renewal of connection: Integrating theory and practice in an understanding of grammatical metaphor. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers, & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 37-64). John Benjamins.

Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schoor, C. (2015). Political metaphor, a matter of purposeful style: On the rational, emotional and strategic purposes of political metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 10(1), 65-98. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.05sch

Sowińska, A. (2013). A critical discourse approach to the analysis of values in political discourse: The example of freedom in President Bush's State of the Union addresses (2001-2008). Discourse & Society, 24(6), 792-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486214

Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). Arnold.

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 728-740). Elsevier.

Wingate, U. (2012). 'Argument!' helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.003

Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.

Yasuda, S. (2019). Children's meaning-making choices in EFL writing: The use of grammatical metaphor. System, 84, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.06.003

Young, L. (2011). Systemic functional linguistics. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 625-637). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-21

How to Cite

Nguyen, O. (2025). Bridging Political and Academic Discourse: A Pedagogical Framework for Teaching Textual Grammatical Metaphors. BRU ELT JOURNAL, 3(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.14456/bej.2025.9

Issue

Section

Articles