Effectiveness Comparison of Plagiarism Detection between Turnitin and iThenticate

Main Article Content

Rattima Jeenapongsa
Chaiyasit Angkapunyadech
Sasithorn Tinamas
Khwantrakul Klinsukon
Piyathida Horpratoom
Patcharin Changtong
Siwanut Srisoontorn
Nawaluk Sangsanit
Nainapa Ngao-koh
Chatrat Saengkhong
Pannathorn Wuttipariyatorn
Sangduan Kammeesawang
Siwaporn Chatparsop
Waraporn Viyanon
Chanpen Klomchaikhow
Anawat Katong
Wannaporn Anuan

Abstract

This research aimed to compare the effectiveness of iThenticate and Turnitin in plagiarism detection, focusing on the analysis of accuracy and precision in detecting similartity. Various types of documents downloaded from online databases, Thai and English theses, as well as content generated by AI were used for testing and comparison of similarity scores detected by both programs. The findings revealed that Turnitin provided higher accuracy particularly when Student Paper Database was included, giving Turnitin a broader detection scope.  However, both softwares exhibited similar precision. Regarding AI-generated content detection, both softwares could partly identified AI-generated text in English documents but were unable to detect AI-generated content in Thai documents. This research can serve as a guideline for selecting appropriate plagiarism detection software for academic institutions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jeenapongsa, R. ., Angkapunyadech, C., Tinamas, S. ., Klinsukon, K. ., Horpratoom, P. ., Changtong, P. ., Srisoontorn, S. ., Sangsanit, N. ., Ngao-koh, N. ., Saengkhong, C. ., Wuttipariyatorn, P. ., Kammeesawang, S. ., Chatparsop, S. ., Viyanon, W. ., Klomchaikhow, C. ., Katong, A. ., & Anuan, W. . (2025). Effectiveness Comparison of Plagiarism Detection between Turnitin and iThenticate. PULINET Journal, 12(1), 228–242. retrieved from https://so14.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PJ/article/view/1291
Section
Research Articles

References

รัตติมา จีนาพงษา, ขวัญตระกูล กลิ่นสุคนธ์, ศศิธร ติณะมาศ, ปิยธิดา ห่อประทุม, ฉันท์ชนิต เกตุน้อย, ศรัญญาภรณ์ โชลิตกุล, มัสยา ฐาปนพันธ์นิติกุล, พัชรินทร์ ช้างทอง, ศิวะนัท ศรีสุนทร, สุรินทรา หล้าสกูล, ธันทิวา ภักดีภัทรากร, เนาวลักษณ์ แสงสนิท, ขวัญชนก วิริยกุลโอภาศ, ชิดชญา แซ่ลิ้ว, นงลักษณ์ จันตา, นัยน์นภา เงาเกาะ, ฉัตรรัตน์ แสงคง, คชาธร ขาวเรือง, สุภาวดี เพชรชื่นสกุล, ฉวีวรรณ บุญธรรม. (2567). การศึกษาประสิทธิภาพในการตรวจสอบการคัดลอกของโปรแกรม Turnitin และ Copyleaks. Pulinet Journal, 11(1), 2567, 136-152. https://so14.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PJ/article/view/543

Adobe. (2024, September 26). Securing PDFs with passwords. https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/securing-pdfs-passwords.html

iTheniticate. (2024a). AI writing detection in the new, enhanced Similarity Report view. https://guides.ithenticate.com/hc/en-us/articles/27835303398541-AI-writing-detection-in-the-new-enhanced-Similarity-Report-view

iThenticate. (2024b). iThenticate release notes. https://guides.ithenticate.com/hc/en-us/articles/27871174228365-iThenticate-release-notes

McCulloch, A., Behrend, M., & Braithwaite, F. (2022). The multiple uses of iThenticate in doctoral education: Policing malpractice or improving research writing?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7100

Rahman, MD. H., Islam, M.H., Andrab, H.M., Sharma, J.P., & Reza, MD. N. (2024). Comparing the Similarity Index Across iThenticate, Ouriginal, and Turnitin Plagiarism Detection Software. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 24(2), 419-424. https://www.efsupit.ro/images/stories/februarie2024/Art51.pdf

Turnitin. (2024). Turnitin’s AI writing detection capabilities FAQs. https://guides.Turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/28477544839821-Turnitin-s-AI-writing-detection-capabilities-FAQs

Turnitin. (n.d.). File requirements. https://guides.Turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/23929463501965-File-requirements