FEDERAL BASEBALL CLUB V. NATIONAL LEAGUE: A CASE STUDY OF CHALLENGES TO BASEBALL GOVERNANCE AND THE EXEMPTIONS OF BASEBALL BUSINESS FROM THE U.S. FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAW
Main Article Content
Abstract
While the U.S. antitrust law focuses on regulating market power to control anticompetitive behaviors and prevent societal detriment in the U.S. sports business market, there is some legal defenses or immunity that shield protect specific industries or activities of baseball from the U.S. federal antitrust law. Federal Baseball Club v. National League as a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court generally centers on expanding contexts of the exemptions of baseball business from the U.S. federal antitrust law. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that industries or activities of baseball was not subject to the U.S. federal antitrust laws. This paper comes to give expression to the importance and role that the U.S. antitrust law now plays in today’s nature of sports business industry in the U.S. This paper also engages in that enquiry by considering the relationship between the relatively legal provisions in the primary federal antitrust law in the U.S. and the exemptions of baseball business from the U.S. federal antitrust law. The study of this case is a prominent tool in justifying the rulings and decisions which provide the exemption from the U.S. federal antitrust laws.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abrams, R. I. (1999). Before the flood: The history of baseball’s antitrust exemption. Marquette Sports Law Review, 9(2), 307–313. https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol9/iss2/7
Alito, S. A., Jr. (2009). The origin of the baseball antitrust exemption: Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs. Journal of Supreme Court History, 34(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5818.2009.01208.x
Ansbro, R. (2026). Replay review: The case for Federal Baseball and the case for overturning it. Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal, 33(1), 33–94. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/mslj/vol33/iss1/2
Arena, H. (2023). Minor league with a major issue: How baseball’s federal antitrust exemption has devastated minor league baseball. West Virginia Law Review Online, 125(2), 1–25. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr-online/vol125/iss2/1
Berri, D. (2021). Oscar Robertson, Antitrust, and the Fight Against Monopsony Power in the NBA. The Antitrust Bulletin, 66(3), 328-358.
Chaljub, J. P. (2025). Pitching for reform: Cangrejeros’ push to level the legal playing field by challenging baseball’s antitrust exemption. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 30(1), 108–135. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1557&context=jcfl
Dunning, A. P., & Kleiman, K. E. (2016). Major league broadcasting: The deleterious effects of Major League Baseball’s antitrust exemption on Nevada consumers with no home team. Nevada Law Journal, 16(3), 1171–1199. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nlj/vol16/iss3/12
Edelman, M., & Holden, J. T. (2024). Baseball’s anticompetitive antitrust exemption. Boston College Law Review, 65(5), 1695–1753. https://lira.bc.edu/works/publication-article/a3dzs-te489
Edelman, M., Grow, N., & Holden, J. T. (2025). The re-monopolization of the U.S. sports trading card industry. University of Illinois Law Review, 2025(1), 63–113. https://illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Grow.pdf
Farzin, L. (2015). On the antitrust exemption for professional sports in the United States and Europe. Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal, 22(1), 75–108. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/mslj/vol22/iss1/2
Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs, 259 U.S. 200 (1922).
Federal Trade Commission. (n.d.). The Antitrust Laws. https://www.ftc.gov/advice-guidance/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws
Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (1972).
Jacob, B. G. (2024). The business of baseball: MiLB’s decision to unionize reintroduces the need to eliminate baseball’s historic antitrust exemption. Louisiana Law Review, 85(1), 341–378. https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol85/iss1/13
Nathanson, M. (2013). Who exempted baseball, anyway? The curious development of the antitrust exemption that never was. Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 4(1), 1–50. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jsel/wp-content/uploads/sites/78/2013/06/Nathanson.pdf
McEvoy, C. (2007). Major League Baseball antitrust immunity: Examining the legal and financial implications of relocation rules. Entertainment and Sports Law Journal, 4(3), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.81
Robertson v. National Basketball Association, 389 F. Supp. 867 (S.D.N.Y. 1975).
Rogers, C. P., III. (1977). Judicial reinterpretation of statutes: The example of baseball and the antitrust laws. Houston Law Review, 14, 611–653. https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1755&context=law_faculty
Society for American Baseball Research. (n.d.). Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs, 259 U.S. 200 (1922). SABR. https://sabr.org/supreme-court/1922
Snyder, D. L. (2008). Anatomy of an aberration: An examination of the attempts to apply antitrust law to Major League Baseball through Flood v. Kuhn (1972). DePaul Journal of Sports Law, 4(2), 177–212. https://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=jslcp