Evaluation of Creative Activity Programs in the Maker Space Based on the Life Space Concept at Thammasat University Library

Main Article Content

Phitsanu Jaikla
Kaewwaraporn Kornkaew
Pathumtip Limpongsanuruk

Abstract

This article aims to evaluate the outcomes of creative activities conducted in the Maker Space of Thammasat University Library, based on the Life Space concept, by applying Constructionism and Experiential Learning theory. The study employs a mixed methods research design through four creative activities covering all four Life Space dimensions: Co-Working Space, Learning Space, Inspiration Space, and Performative Space. The sample comprised 48 Thammasat University students who participated in the activities. Data were collected through satisfaction questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and photographic documentation of the activities. The evaluation results indicate that participants reported the highest level of overall satisfaction. Participants gained new knowledge and skills, were able to create unique works, and developed greater confidence in using creative technologies. However, the findings also highlight areas for improvement, particularly in publicity, accessibility, and certain environmental conditions within the Maker Space. Overall, the study suggests that creative activities designed under the Life Space concept can effectively support hands-on learning, foster future-ready skills, and strengthen the role of the university library as a space for learning and creativity. The evaluation findings can serve as practical guidance for improving and further developing creative activities in the Maker Space to better meet users’ needs in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jaikla, P., Kornkaew, K., & Limpongsanuruk, P. (2026). Evaluation of Creative Activity Programs in the Maker Space Based on the Life Space Concept at Thammasat University Library . PULINET Journal, 13(2), A1-A14. https://doi.org/10.66692/pulinet.13.2.2706
Section
Academic Articles

References

แก้ววราภรณ์ กรแก้ว, ขนิษฐา แก้วมะลัง, และอรพรรณ คงมาลัย. (2567). การจัดการพื้นที่ตามแนวคิดใหม่ Library of Life. PULINET Journal, 11(1), 237–251. https://so14.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PJ/article/view/568

ยุภาพร ทองน้อย และคณะ. (2564). KKU Maker Space ความท้าทายและโอกาสในช่วงวิกฤติโควิด 19 [KKU Maker Space Through COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities]. ใน การประชุมวิชาการระดับชาติ PULINET ครั้งที่ 11 (PULINET 2021): New Normal for Libraries: Opportunities & Challenges. PULINET. https://pulinet2021.pulinet.org/uploads_file_completely/2020-12-30/pulinet71-OM.pdf

Curiosity Commons. (n.d.). Maker spaces: The challenges. https://curiositycommons.wordpress.com/MakerSpaces-the-challenges

Hayat, S., Shahzad, F., Mahmood, K., Akhtar, M. N., & Batool, S. (2025). The role of Maker Spaces in academic libraries: A systematic literature review. Sociology & Cultural Research Review, 4(1), 536–550. https://www.scrrjournal.com/index.php/14/article/view/327

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Kroski, E. (2017). The Maker Space librarian's sourcebook. ALA Editions.

Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. S. (2013). Invent to learn: Makers in the classroom. The Education Digest, 79(4), 11.

Okuonghae, O. (2019). Creating maker spaces in Nigerian libraries: Issues and challenges. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 9(2), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss.2019.9.2.625

Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–11). Ablex Publishing.

TK Park. (2015). Maker Space แหล่งเรียนรู้ของนักสร้างนวัตกรรม. https://www.tkpark.or.th/tha/articles_detail/233/Maker-Space-แหล่งเรียนรู้ของนักสร้างนวัตกรรม

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.