The Development of Legal Mechanisms in the Active Shooter Alert System: A Comparative Study of Thai and American Laws

Abstract

          This study aims to analyze and develop legal mechanisms for an active shooter alert system in Thailand by comparing it with the laws and alert systems of the United States, a country that has effectively developed and integrated emergency alert systems. The research focuses on studying relevant laws, systems, and best practices to propose guidelines for implementation in Thailand.

The study found that Thailand lacks a comprehensive and efficient emergency alert system for active shooter incidents, in contrast to the United States, which has a variety of alert systems such as the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA). These systems enable rapid alerts via television, radio, and mobile phones. Additionally, the U.S. has developed the Integrated Public Alert & Warning System (IPAWS), a national-level alert system that connects multiple government agencies to ensure a unified and highly effective public warning system.

Furthermore, the Active Shooter Alert Act of 2022, which is under consideration in the U.S. Senate, aims to establish a dedicated alert system for active shooter incidents. This legislation serves as a key reference for Thailand in developing its legal framework. Provisions from this act can be adapted to create an appropriate alert system for Thailand, such as enhancing interagency cooperation, utilizing technology to promptly notify the public of active shooter incidents, and establishing clear operational procedures for public warnings.

The findings suggest that the development of laws governing Thailand’s active shooter alert system should include clear and comprehensive legal guidelines, drawing on the U.S. model while adapting it to fit Thailand’s legal and social context. A well-structured legal framework will help ensure timely public notifications, reduce casualties, and enhance overall public safety.