AGROECOLOGY IN BUDDHIST FARMING COMMUNITIES OFFERS A HOLISTIC, CULTURALLY RESONANT PATH TO SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS.

ผู้แต่ง

  • Phra Anuphon Chanh Tam Maneerut Anam Nikaya Sangha
  • Chananan Rinthanalert
  • Pruchya Meenongthongmahasan

คำสำคัญ:

Agroecology, Buddhist farming communities, sustainability, ecological wisdom, food security, interconnectedness

บทคัดย่อ

The integration of agroecology within Buddhist farming communities offers a culturally resonant and holistic approach to sustainable food systems. Grounded in ecological wisdom and Buddhist principles of interconnectedness and compassion, agroecology transcends conventional agricultural practices to become a profound expression of ethical values and spiritual insight. This synergy fosters

empowerment within communities through the recognition and utilization of traditional knowledge, enhancing cultural resilience and local adaptation. By reducing reliance on synthetic inputs, agroecology promotes soil health, biodiversity, and resilience to climate change, ultimately enhancing food security and nutrition outcomes. Furthermore, agroecology fosters community cohesion by promoting shared purpose, collaboration, and a deeper connection with nature, while safeguarding cultural heritage in the face of globalization. Through its integration, agroecology not only addresses environmental and socio-economic challenges but also strengthens the symbiotic relationship between humans and nature, offering a promising pathway towards sustainable futures rooted in both ecological wisdom and cultural legacy.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture (2nd ed.). pp 96.

Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press. pp 13 - 20.

Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93(1 - 3), pp 1 - 24.

Altieri, M. A. (1995). Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(1), pp 35 - 42.

Altieri, M. A., & Nicholls, C. I. (2017). Agroecology and the design of climate change - resilient farming systems. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 41 (7 - 8), pp 877 - 899.

Asian Farmers' Association for Sustainable Rural Development (AFA). (2018). Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) in Asia: A Review of Status, Challenges, and Opportunities. Quezon City, Philippines.

Baldock, J., Beaufoy, G., Brouwer, F., & Godeschalk, F. (1996). Farming at the margins: Abandonment or redeployment of agricultural land in Europe. European Commission, Directorate General for Agriculture Vol. 22, pp. 1 - 164.

Bhikkhu, T. (2016). What the Buddha Taught. Bukkyo Dendo Kyokai America. pp 45 - 67.

Bodhi, B. (2012). Dependent origination: The Buddhist law of conditionality. Buddhist Publication Society. p 14.

Earthscan., Jackson, L. E., & Pascual, U. (2016). Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(1), pp 1 - 20.

Gliessman, S. R. (2007). Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems (2nd ed.). CRC Press. pp 3 - 18

Gliessman, S. R. (2014). Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. CRC Press. pp 231 - 243.

Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011). Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional vs. organic agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1 - 2), pp 95 - 124.

Hendrickson, J., James, H. S., & Heffernan, W. D. (2001). Globalization, localization, and sustainable livelihoods. Sociologia Ruralis, 41(4), pp 345 - 363.

Kremen, C., & Miles, A. (2012). Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 17(4), p 40.

Kuyek, D. (2002). The globalization of agriculture: Implication for sustainability of small horticultural farms in Canada. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 23(3), pp 545 - 564.

Mollison, B. (1990). Permaculture: A practical guide for a sustainable future. Island Press.

Paungfoo - Lonhienne, C., & Lonhienne, T. G. A. (2012). Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Thailand. In K. S. M. Rahman & S. H. Rahman (Eds.), Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 7 pp. 247 - 264.

Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J., & Wright, A. L. (2009). Nature's matrix: Linking agriculture, conservation, and food sovereignty.

Poudel, D. D., & Dhakal, M. R. (2015). Agroecological practices for biodiversity conservation and improved livelihoods: A case of middle mountain region of Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 16, pp 105 - 116.

Sangha, K. K., & Reis, P. M. (2018). Buddhist economics: A middle way for the marketplace. pp 72.

Scoones, I., & Thompson, J. (2009). Beyond farmer first revisited: agricultural professional knowledge in practice. World Development, 37(10), pp 1759 - 1769.

Thammarat, K., & Jieqiong, S. (2019). The Sufficiency Economy Philosophy in Thailand: Origin, Development, and Implementation. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(3), pp 308 - 325.

Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J. F., Ferrer, A., & Peigné, J. (2014). Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(1), pp 1 - 20.

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2025-11-15

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Chanh Tam Maneerut Anam Nikaya Sangha , P. A. ., Rinthanalert , C. ., & Meenongthongmahasan, P. . (2025). AGROECOLOGY IN BUDDHIST FARMING COMMUNITIES OFFERS A HOLISTIC, CULTURALLY RESONANT PATH TO SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยชินวัตร, 1(1), 30–35. สืบค้น จาก https://so14.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JESIU/article/view/2446