About the Journal

Policy for Consideration of Published Works

General Guidelines

  1. The submitted work must not have been previously published or disseminated in any journal, conference proceedings, or any other publications.

  2. The submitted work must not be under consideration for publication in any journal or other publications.

  3. Any opinions and comments expressed in the article are the views of the author. The editorial board does not necessarily agree with those opinions and is not responsible for them. In the case of any legal action regarding copyright infringement, the author alone is responsible.

  4. The copyright of the article belongs to the author, and the University of Bangkok Suvarnabhumi reserves the right according to the law. Re-publishing the article requires written permission from both the author and the University of Bangkok Suvarnabhumi.

Types of Works Accepted for Publication

The Bangkok Suvarnabhumi Academic Journal considers publishing articles in both Thai and English, as follows:

  1. Academic Articles

  2. Research Articles

  3. Review Articles

  4. Book Reviews

Article Review Process

  1. The article to be considered for publication must demonstrate academic quality and offer benefits both theoretically, allowing researchers to develop or create new knowledge, and practically, enabling practitioners to apply it in various sectors such as government, business, society, and communities.

  2. The article must undergo a peer review process by two experts in the relevant field and receive approval from the editorial board.

Peer Review Process

  1. The editorial board will notify the author once the article has been received and is complete.

  2. The editorial board will verify whether the article falls within the scope of the journal and evaluate its academic quality and theoretical and practical value.

  3. If the editorial board deems the article suitable for consideration for publication, the article will be sent for peer review to two experts in the relevant field. The peer review process is conducted as a double-blind process, meaning neither the reviewer nor the author will know each other's identity. Once the experts have evaluated the article, the editorial board will make a decision based on their recommendations, either accepting the article for publication, requesting revisions and further evaluation, or rejecting the article.