The Model Development of Organizing Learning Experiences Using Collaborative Thinking Process to Promote Creativity for Early Childhood
Keywords:
organizing learning experiences model, creativity, collaborative thinking process, early childhoodAbstract
This Research and Development aimed to 1) study model of organizing learning experiences using collaborative thinking process to promote creativity for early childhood 2) develop organizing learning experiences plan using collaborative thinking process to promote creativity for early childhood 3) study the results of using the organizing learning experiences plan using collaborative thinking process to promote creativity for early childhood 4) evaluate and authenticate model of organizing learning experiences using collaborative thinking process to promote creativity for early childhood.
The preliminary experimental plan was One Group Pretest – Posttest. Sample was Kindergarten 3 students in Bandonkhoi "Kongsomoatratbamrung" School, Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Primary Educational Service Area Office 1, Office of the Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education, who were studying during semester 2 in the academic year 2023 comprised of 15 students in the same classroom. The sample was selected by purposive sampling. The study employed a one-group pretest-posttest design. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and t-test.
The outcome revealed that the model of organizing learning experiences using collaborative thinking process consisted of 1. Input; included setting objectives, group thinking, content, communication and interaction 2. Process; included task assignment, discussion, collaborative thinking, thinking reflection, operation, presentation and summarization 3. Output; included learning achievement, creativity, and satisfaction 4. Feedback; included learning achievement score, 7 creativities thinking, and satisfaction level. The results of evaluating the appropriateness of the learning experience model using collaborative thinking process was at the most appropriate level (x ̅ = 4.64). The results of evaluating quality of organizing learning experiences plan were at the highest quality level (x ̅ = 4.53). The results of using organizing learning experiences plan revealed that the post-learning achievement score was higher than the pre-learning achievement score with the statistical significance at .05 level. The learning effectiveness index value was equal to 0.61 or 61 percent. The comparison between students using and non-using organizing learning experiences plan showed that the score of the students using organizing learning experiences plan were higher with the statistical significance at .05 level. The satisfaction of students using organizing learning experiences plan was at high satisfaction (x ̅ = 2.27). The results of evaluating quality of the learning experience model were at the most appropriate level (x ̅ = 4.48). The results of certification of learning experience model showed that it was appropriate for the research objectives and could be published in the academic community.
This learning experience model should be applied to develop creativity in early childhood in various contexts, with long-term effects studied. Further development to promote other essential skills for early childhood is also suggested.
References
กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2560). หลักสูตรการศึกษาปฐมวัย พุทธศักราช 2560. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย.
สุรางค์ โค้วตระกูล. (2556). ผลของการจัดกิจกรรมศิลปะสร้างสรรค์ที่มีต่อความคิดสร้างสรรค์ของเด็กปฐมวัย. วารสารวิชาการ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏพระนคร, 4(2), 91-104.
วรรณี วัจนสวัสดิ์. (2557). การพัฒนาความคิดสร้างสรรค์ของเด็กปฐมวัยโดยใช้เกมการศึกษา. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร, 16(3), 114-125.
Anderson, J. E. (1975). Public Policy - Making. New York: Praeger.
Balkcom, Stephen. (1992). Education Research Consumer Guide. Archived: Cooperative Learning. Retrieved 28 February 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/OR/ConsumerGuides/cooplear.html
Barkley, C., Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Cliatt, P.J., M.J. Shaw, and J.M. Sherwood. (1980). Effects of Training on the Divergent Thinking Abilities of Kindergarten Children. Child Development. 51(102): 1061-1064.
Cobra, E. R. (2011). The Effect Group Plays on the Development of the Creativity of Six year Children. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 2137-2141.
Davis, F. B. (1981). Education Measurement and Their Interpretation. California: Wadsworth.
Davis, G.A. and J.A Scott. (1983). Training Creative Thinking. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Ford, B.C. (1976). Evaluation of creativity with mentally retarded youngster. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 6598-A.
Garaigordobil, M., & Berrueco, L. (2011). Effects of a play program on creative thinking of preschool children. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 608-618.
Getzels, J.W. and Jackson P.W. (1962). Creativity and Intelligence. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Goodman. R.I. ; K.A. Fletcher and E.W. Schneider. (1980). “The Effectiveness Index as a Comparative Measure in Media Product Evaluation,” Educational Technology. 20(09) : 30-34 ; May.
Guerra, M.,& Zuccoli, F. (2012). Finished and Unfinished Objects: Supporting Children’s Creativity through Materials. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51(5012), 721-727.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Creativity and Its Cultivation. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford and Hoepfner, R. (1971) The Analysis of Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Hutchison, E.D. (1949). How to Think Creativity. New York: Abindon press.
Kefi, S. (2009). The Implementation of Creatively art Activities in Pre-school Education, for Supporting the Children’s Creativeness in a Dynamic Learning Environment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2408-2410.
Jellen, G. and K. Urban. (1986). Test for Creative Thinking Drawing Production. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly. 11(8): 107-155.
Jersild, Arther T. (1972). Child Development. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative,Competitive and Individualistic Learning. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kelley, Ramona M. ; & Daniel. (1986). Effects of An Administrative Plan for Excellence in Creative Arts Experience on the Development of Creative in first Graders. Dissertation Abstracts International. 44(01) : 32-A
Kim, S., Choe, I., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). The development and evaluation of the effect of creative problem-solving program on young children’s creativity and character. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33.
Mile, A. (1961). Creativity in Teaching. California: Wadsworth Publishing company.
Penick, John E. (1976). Creative in Fifth Grade Science Students: The Effects of Two Patterns of Instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13(2), 307-314.
Senge, Peter M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Century Press.
Stampp. Ray V. (1964). Relationship of Measures of Creativity General Intelligence and Memory. Dissertation Abstract International. 5258-A.
Torrance. (1964). Growing Up Creatively Gifted: The 22-Year Longitudinal Study.
The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 3, 148-158.
Torrance, E. P. (1965). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. Daedalus, 94(3), 663-681.
Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search for satori and creativity. New York: Creative Education Foundation. Inc.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 journal of business and society innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.