Social Inequality and Political Participation of Thai Citizens
Keywords:
Social inequality, Political participation, Thailand, Civic engagement, DemocracyAbstract
This article examines the intricate relationship between social inequality and political participation in Thailand. It explores how disparities in income, education, and regional development shape access to political processes, both electoral and non-electoral. Drawing on empirical data and case studies, the study highlights how marginalized communities face systemic barriers to engagement due to patronage politics, limited civic education, and legal repression. The article concludes with policy recommendations to promote inclusive participation through civic education reform, electoral restructuring, and legal protections for civil society.
References
Callahan, W. A. (2000). Pollwatching, elections and civil society in Southeast Asia. Ashgate.
Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space: Democracy and human rights support under fire. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Chambers, P. (2013). Ethnic minorities and political inclusion in Thailand. Asian Ethnicity, 14(1), 33–53.
Chambers, P., & Waitoolkiat, N. (2016). Military, monarchy and repression: Assessing Thailand’s authoritarian turn. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 445–466.
Chambers, P., & Waitoolkiat, N. (2020). Entrenched military influence in Thailand’s politics. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 42(1), 1–29.
Credit Suisse. (2018). Global Wealth Report 2018. https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/global-wealth-report.html
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
Dressel, B., & Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang. (2020). Judicialization of politics in Thailand. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 42(3), 423–451.
Election Commission of Thailand. (2019). General Election Turnout Report. https://www.ect.go.th
Hewison, K. (2014). Thailand: Contestation over elections in a hybrid regime. In A. Croissant & M. Bünte (Eds.), The crisis of democratic governance in Southeast Asia (pp. 89–110). Palgrave Macmillan.
Human Rights Watch. (2022). Thailand: End repression of democracy protests. https://www.hrw.org
ILO. (2021). Informal Employment in Thailand. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org
Kerr, D. (1999). Citizenship education: An international comparison. National Foundation for Educational Research.
Laothamatas, A. (1996). A tale of two democracies: Conflicting perceptions of elections and democracy in Thailand. In R. H. Taylor (Ed.), The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia (pp. 201–223). Cambridge University Press.
McCargo, D. (2019). Fighting for virtue: Justice and politics in Thailand. Cornell University Press.
McCargo, D., & Ukrist Pathmanand. (2005). The Thaksinization of Thailand. NIAS Press.
Montesano, M. J., Chachavalpongpun, P., & Chongkittavorn, K. (Eds.). (2012). Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a divided Thailand. ISEAS Publishing.
Nie, N. H., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. University of Chicago Press.
Pasuk Phongpaichit & Chris Baker. (2009). Thaksin. Silkworm Books.
Phongpaichit, P., & Baker, C. (2004). Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. Silkworm Books.
Sinpeng, A. (2021). Digital dissent in Thailand: From flash mobs to hashtag movements. Critical Asian Studies, 53(3), 360–377.
UNDP. (2021). Thailand Human Development Report: Equality and Access in the Digital Age. https://www.th.undp.org
UNESCO. (2015). Education for All 2015 National Review Report: Thailand. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
Walker, A. (2012). Thailand’s Political Peasants: Power in the Modern Rural Economy. University of Wisconsin Press.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows others to share the article with proper attribution to the authors and prohibits commercial use or modification. For any other reuse or republication, permission from the journal and the authors is required.
